News

The Supreme Court rejects a student's appeal against the JNUSU polls' rejection of their nomination.

 



A student's appeal disputing the denial of her candidacy to run in the Jawaharlal Nehru University Students Union elections on April 25 was dismissed by the Supreme Court today. 

Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta's bench declined to "interfere with the regulation" that prohibited candidates above 25 from running in the Jawaharlal Nehru University Students Union (JNUSU) elections.

After first requesting that the student's attorney file a case in the Delhi High Court, the bench heard the plea and rejected it. 
Rithu Anubha C, a first-year post-graduate student, claimed that JNU was required to hold student union elections within six to seven weeks of the commencement of the academic year by citing the J M Lyngdoh committee's guidelines. 

According to the student's attorney, she would have been qualified to run if the JNU administration had held the elections in September, as is customary. 

According to the attorney, her nomination papers were denied without her fault because she was just over 25 years old.

"Every year in September, JNUSU elections are held," the attorney stated.

However, the bench stated, "During the COVID-19 pandemic, many universities did not have elections. Does that imply that older people will eventually be able to challenge? dismissed. 

JNU has received 250 nominations for the position of school councillor and 165 for the four central panel positions of the JNUSU. The JNUSU elections are set on April 25. 

With counting scheduled to start at 9 p.m. that same day, voting will take place in two stages: from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. and from 2.30 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. The results are expected by April 28. 

 


Related News

If the accused is served with a consolidated notice of demand, a single complaint for the dishonor of more than three checks may be maintained: The J&K&L High Court

Orissa High Court Shares Concerns About Data Breach & Privacy Violations While Upholding Mandatory PAN-Aadhaar Linking For Demat Accounts

The Supreme Court dismisses the case against a public servant, stating that S. 197 CrPC does not envision the concept of "deemed sanction."

Community Invitation

Enjoying LawRead?

You've been reading on LawRead! Create a free student or advocate account to unlock our complete legal platform:

Premium Courses & Mock Tests Judiciary, UGC-NET, and Bar examination lecture bundles, video classes, and structured notes.
Community Discussion Forum Ask legal questions, reply to ongoing case discussions, and connect with legal scholars and peers.
Unlimited PDF Downloads Download Bare Acts, landmark judgments, study notes, and legal updates without any limit.

Sign in to LawRead

Sign In
Create Account
Forgot Password?
New to LawRead? Join Free
Already registered? Sign In

Verify Your Email

Enter the 6-digit OTP sent to

Didn't receive code? Resend OTP • Back to Sign In

Forgot Password

Enter your registered email address to receive a 6-digit password reset OTP.

Remember your password? Sign In

Create New Password

Enter the OTP sent to and choose a new password.

Didn't receive code? Resend OTP • Back to Sign In