News

Two judges from the Telangana High Court should be transferred, according to the collegium.

The proposed transfers are being made in order to "infuse inclusivity and diversity at the level of High Courts and to strengthen the quality of administration of justice." 

 


Two Telangana High Court judges, Justices P Sree Sudha and K Surender, have been recommended for transfer by the Supreme Court Collegium. 

Justice Surender is scheduled to be transferred to the Madras High Court, while Justice Sudha is suggested to be moved to the Karnataka High Court. 

Following the April 15 and 19 meetings, the Collegium released its statement. The proposed transfers are being made in order to "infuse inclusivity and diversity at the level of High Courts and to strengthen the quality of administration of justice." 

Justice Sudha received her legal education from Guntur's AC College of Law. She worked as an advocate in Tenali, Srikalahasti, and Kavali after registering with the Andhra Pradesh Bar Council. In August 2002, she was admitted after being chosen as a district judge for direct recruits. She was promoted to the Telangana High Court in October 2021 after 19 years of service with the district judiciary. 

After earning a degree in geology, Justice Surender studied law and started practicing in 1992. He has represented the Central government in the Andhra Pradesh High Court as an Assistant Additional Standing Counsel. In order to prosecute the Satyam scam case, he was appointed as Senior Counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). In November 2022, he advanced to the Bench. 

In contrast to its sanctioned number of forty-two justices, the Telangana High Court now has thirty judges working for it.


Related News

If the accused is served with a consolidated notice of demand, a single complaint for the dishonor of more than three checks may be maintained: The J&K&L High Court

Orissa High Court Shares Concerns About Data Breach & Privacy Violations While Upholding Mandatory PAN-Aadhaar Linking For Demat Accounts

The Supreme Court dismisses the case against a public servant, stating that S. 197 CrPC does not envision the concept of "deemed sanction."

Community Invitation

Enjoying LawRead?

You've been reading on LawRead! Create a free student or advocate account to unlock our complete legal platform:

Premium Courses & Mock Tests Judiciary, UGC-NET, and Bar examination lecture bundles, video classes, and structured notes.
Community Discussion Forum Ask legal questions, reply to ongoing case discussions, and connect with legal scholars and peers.
Unlimited PDF Downloads Download Bare Acts, landmark judgments, study notes, and legal updates without any limit.

Sign in to LawRead

Sign In
Create Account
Forgot Password?
New to LawRead? Join Free
Already registered? Sign In

Verify Your Email

Enter the 6-digit OTP sent to

Didn't receive code? Resend OTP • Back to Sign In

Forgot Password

Enter your registered email address to receive a 6-digit password reset OTP.

Remember your password? Sign In

Create New Password

Enter the OTP sent to and choose a new password.

Didn't receive code? Resend OTP • Back to Sign In